Home

First take a look at one of the most shocking videos in the world! This video actually shows the powers that be are lying to you—Here’s What They Don’t Want You to Know!

I deplore the blame game, so often used to divert attention from the real issue or problem. I rail against the fake binaries deliberately created to divide and rule us, and yet, in this article, I refer to billionaire oligarchs—and their establishment—as “the parasite class.” Please bear with me, I will attempt to explain this apparent hypocrisy.

A current internet search on the term “oligarchy” will repeatedly try to convince you that oligarchy relates specifically to Russia. This is complete rubbish.

An oligarch is someone who has amassed immense wealth and converted it into political and social authority. That is what an oligarch has always been, ever since humanity started calling them “oligarchs.” Russia is an oligarchy but, as revealed by almost all political theory and the thousands of years of political philosophy, science and history, so is every other nation state.

The question is how does one become an oligarch? The suggestion is that some achieve oligarch status due to their shrewd business acumen. Many people are astute in business but that alone is not enough to rise to the oligarchy. In order to be an oligarch you have to be accepted by the other oligarchs. If oligarchs oppose you, your business will probably be crushed, or at least severely restricted, and access to political authority or social influence will be stifled.

You’ll Understand Everything After Watching This VIDEO! 

Some are hereditary oligarchs, others become fabulously wealthy by virtue of operating practical monopolies, others benefit from nepotism and others leverage their network connections. But all oligarchs achieve and then maintain their power and influence through exploitation. Whether it is wage slavery—or simply slavery—industrial espionage, lawfare, war, other forms of violence, debt leverage, economic oppression, land grabs, theft or just deceit, the oligarchy is a gaggle of robber barons.

There is nothing inherently wrong with philanthropy but oligarchs use philanthropy to engineer society in their favour, create new markets for themselves, and increase their political and/or social authority. In short, the oligarch stands apart from the ordinary wealthy by virtue, not only of the scale of their wealth but, most notably, by the unscrupulous self-serving manner in which they acquire and abuse the authority their immense wealth affords them.

We, the people, are the source of both the oligarchs wealth and the political authority they hoard. While we may glean some benefit from the activities of the oligarchy—such as employment or infrastructure investment, etc.—this relationship is far more beneficial to the oligarch than it is to us. Otherwise, the oligarchy wouldn’t bother.

The definition of a parasite is:

An organism that lives on or in another and derives its nourishment therefrom

The definition of social class is:

A group of people within a society who possess the same socioeconomic status.

An oligarch’s only socioeconomic peer is another oligarch. The oligarchy’s collective effect upon society is parasitic.

The oligarchy is the parasite class.

Introducing Elite Theory

The common term we are given to refer to oligarchs is “the elite.” The fact that we commonly use this language to describe the parasite class is a clear example of social engineering. Unless we break free from the linguistic chains that bind our thoughts and control how we discuss the oligarchy we will continue to be ruled by them, whether we like it or not.

The concept of the “elite” largely stems from “elite theory”: a branch of political science that sprang up in the late 19th and early 20th century. Elite theory tries to explain why society is divided between the broad mass of the people and a ruling minority who always hold power.

Elite theory supposedly provides a scientific rationale to explain why, no matter where or when we look, a tiny clique controls nearly all the resources and possesses overwhelming financial, economic and political power, which they then use to rule. Throughout history, this deleterious power dynamic has sometimes been recognised by the people—who usually opposed it once they realised it—but mostly not. We largely accept it, as if it were some sort of organic aspect of society.

Broadly speaking, elite theory has rehashed ideas that are thousands of years old. As an academic field, elite theory is yet to present anything new. It reveals that all forms of government are essentially oligarchies, but most political historians already knew that. All “elite theory” does is reinforce many of the canards we are expected to swallow.

In elite theory the the word “elite” is a polysemic term that can mean “aristocracy,” in the classical sense. It comes from the French “aristocracie,” meaning “government by those who are the best citizens.” This is derived from the Greek ”aristokratia,” meaning “government or rule of [by] the best.”

In order to avoid obviously eulogising oligarchs too much, “elite” is also used by other elite theorists to denote a “ruling class,” absent the “aristokratia” inference. The etymology of the word “elite” is formed from the French “élite” meaning “pick out, choose,” derived from the Latin eligere, meaning “choose.”

Elite theory alternately perceives “the elite” as the best among us who lead by merit or as the ruling or “political class” we sometimes choose. The political class interpretation stems from the work of Gaetano Mosca (1858 – 1941) who noted that oligarchs often gained power using coercion and violence but were particularly well organised and thus, with control of nearly all resources, ruled.

Either way, there is a suggestion that oligarchs benefit from some kind of meritocracy. Use of “meritocracy” can be traced back to Plato (c. 424/423 – 348/347 BCE)—more on him shortly—and is now used to denote, according the Oxford English Dictionary, “a ruling or influential class of educated or able people” or “government or the holding of power by people selected according to merit.” The oligarch is either the best among us or a powerful member of a well organised clique. Or so say elite theorists and publications that serve the oligarchs.

In modern use, the word “meritocracy” was popularised by the sociologist Michael Dunlop Young (1915-2002). He used it as a ironic spoof, warning people that selecting “leaders,” based upon their social status and formal educational qualifications, was a sure-fire way of ending up with completely crap government. That “meritocracy” has come to mean something “good” disappointed him until his dying day.

The problem with the common acceptance of the word “elite,” based upon “elite theory,” is that it suggests an inevitability. As if being ordered around by a bunch of oligarchs—call them black nobs, stakeholder capitalist, banksters or whatever—is just the way it is. It is as it always has been, so get used to it. Resistance is futile!

Vilfredo Pareto (1848 – 1923) has been credited with coining the term “the elite.” He offered his “circulation of the elite” theory which posited that conflict between “elites” often sees one group supplant another at the top of the hierarchical social structure. The other aspect of “circulation” was that individuals move in and out of elite circles.

Pareto noted that the elite were human beings capable of doing good but also of committing great evil. Although he maintained that they ruled as a result of their distinguished abilities and exceptional virtues.

BREAKING! EX-PENTAGON WHISTLEBLOWER: THE FINAL RESET HAS ALREADY STARTED – DARKNESS IS NOT COMING, IT’S HERE…

Wikipedia, which is useful for names, dates and official histories but little else, claims that the American philosopher C. Wright Mills (1916 – 1962), who wrote about the “power elite,” is the right guy to go to if you want to understand all there is to know about the elite. Being Wikipedia, that opinion, offered as some sort of fact, is wrong.

Mills argued that the “power elite” just happen. They are an inevitable consequence of modern bureaucratic and technological society. This necessarily places authority in the hands of those who lead its institutions. If the elite, with their control of resources, didn’t lead these institutions, Mills claimed they wouldn’t function.

Mills rejected Mosca’s concept of the “politicqal class.” Instead “the elite” circulated, as Valfredo suggested, and rose out of the corporate organisations that dominated the US economy to become the “corporate rich.”

Mills suggested a “tripartate” model of US society, broadly split into the “power elite,” the “opinion leaders” and the public. This came as a bit of a shock to 1950’s Americans who viewed the US as an “egalitarian meritocracy.”.

He said that government, local leaders and interest groups formed the “opinion leaders” and the public were powerless, clueless proles who, unwittingly, were completely reliant upon the power elite for their economic survival. The public wrongly imagined that the opinion leaders made the decisions. Whereas, Mills demonstrated, the “power elite” dominated the institutions of the economy (corporations), the military and the government. The parasite class shared a common perspective and were the real decision makers.

But, to Mills’ mind, there was no “conspiracy” to see. The power elite controlled the resources, the economy and the lives of the little people. Like Pareto, he acknowledged that they could make both beneficial and disastrous decisions, but this was just a necessary and unavoidable function of a hierarchical society he said.

In short, Mills’ take on “elite theory” was in keeping with its general trajectory. It is consistently favourable to those who like to be thought of as “the elite,” even when it criticises them. Someone’s got to be in charge and, according nearly all elite theorists, it’s “the elite.”

Robert Michels (1876 – 1936) said that the technical demands of society made oligarch leadership indispensable to the survival of an organisation. Like Mills, Mosca and Pareto, etc., Michels believed that oligarchs achieved their status because they possessed superior knowledge, skills, and wealth. Michels added that this enabled them, not only to control their own compliant networks but also dissenting groups.

While Mosca viewed the elite’s organisational skills as a tool that enabled them to form the “political class,” Michels identified the same abilities as key to transforming the political structure into an oligarchy. Essentially, he argued, political parties were ruled by oligarchs who held all the power and shaped all the policies. This left the membership and the “grassroots” party activists floundering around, wrongly imagining they had some sort of say over the direction of the party.

Nothing New

The broadly consistent “elite theory”—that a society is best managed by a small subset of its constituent members and that somehow this alleged inevitability is evidence of meritocracy—can all be traced back to the “Guardians” of Plato‘s “Republic.”

Plato believed there were three aspects to the nature of man: appetite, spirit and reason.

These elements of the “soul” or “psyche” are in constant flux within us all and are either dominant of subservient. Therefore, Plato thought, human society was split into a “tripartate” structure: the Artisans (producers), the Auxiliaries (military) and the Guardians (rulers).

Thus ordered, we can all shut up, work until we drop, die in wars or, in the case of the rulers (Guardians), order people to work until they drop and die in wars. Thousands of years after Plato’s death, the leading elite theorist C. Wright Mills would advance more or less the same theory.

Plato, who was an aristocrat from an extremely wealthy and powerful family of rulers (Guardians), thought that the Guardians (rulers) were so special—gifted in wisdom, intellect and moral virtue—that they needed to receive the best education, immense advantage and plenty of time to become the philosopher rulers. Just like Plato and his mates.

While 19th and early 20th century elite theorists predominantly focused on ruling oligarchies constricted to nation states, we now live in a globalised world (apparently) and global governance is very much on the cards. The oligarch has gone international. In truth, they always were.

David Rothkopf, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations—so no conflict of interest there—wrote a whole book about the global parasite class (oligarchs) but called them, unsurprisingly, “the Superclass.” His opinion was very much in keeping with “elite theory.”

The “Superclass” can move billions and shape global markets, they own the lobby industry and are the patrons of political careers the world over, easily able to “influence” and control government and intergovernmental policy. But, once again, the so-called Superclass are the inescapable product of meritocracy, claimed Rothkopf.

These extremely motivated and knowledgeable people—according to Rothkopf—perhaps numbering no more than 6,000 – 7,000, possess real global power. Although they often act in concert, they are “global leaders” because they just happen to be global leaders. There’s no need for conspiratorial thinking he said. It seems there never is.

If Plato’s theory had any merit, you might expect roughly a third of the population to be rulers. Yet, despite the fact that elite theory has essentially added nothing to Plato’s ideas, according to David Rothkopf, only about 0.000000875% of us end up being philosopher “Guardian” kings.

This, we are told, is just the inevitable consequence of meritocracy. There is no such thing as conspiracy.

Understanding The Parasite Class

If we really want to understand the parasite class then we can start by going back more than two and a half thousand years to the Greek philosopher and polymath, Aristotle (c. 384–322 BCE).

Aristotle—Plato’s pupil—described the “true” forms of government as “monarchy” (the rule of one), “aristocracy” (the rule of the few) and “polity” (the rule of the many). Each could govern effectively in the “common interest” he said. He also stated that each could be “perverted” by “private interest.”

A monarchy could be perverted into a “tyranny”—which Aristotle considered the worst possible form of government—an aristocracy could degenerate into an “oligarchy” (oligarchia) and the polity could be sufficiently corrupted to devolve into a “democracy.”

Aristotle suggested that government was commonly perverted by “private interest.” As such, it was most likely to be either an oligarchy or a democracy.

The distribution of wealth, and more importantly the political power it could buy, was key to Aristotle’s concept of oligarchies and democracies:

The real difference between democracy and oligarchy is poverty and wealth. Wherever men rule by reason of their wealth, whether they be few or many, that is an oligarchy, and where the poor rule, that is a democracy.

He added:

Oligarchy is when men of property have government in their hands; democracy is the opposite, when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers

Aristotle’s apparent notion of “democracy”—admittedly cobbled together from the remnants of his work on the Athenian Constitution—wasn’t democracy at all. It was something closer to “representative democracy,” which is more like mob rule.

Even without the influence of “oligarchs,” mob rule is precisely what we get from our modern delusions about “democracy.” When a big enough bunch of us “elect” our favourite gang, they make the law. Allegedly they do so on behalf of the ruling throng. They then enforce “the will of the people” with threats of violence levelled against anyone who doesn’t comply.

Mob rule.

To grasp what real “democracy” is, as averse to the Aristotelian misinterpretation we imagine it to be, we need to go back more than 150 years prior to Aristotle to the Greek political reformist Cleisthenes (c. 570 – 508 BCE), who established genuine “demokratia.”

Democracy (demokratia), unlike “representative democracy,” means government by trial by jury, where randomly selected juries of the people are both the supreme legislature and the final arbiter of justice—by applying Natural law. Demokratia is genuinely the rule of “the people,” not politicians, judges or “oligarchs.”

I digress, but the point is, while Aristotle made many telling observations about political systems, he was critiquing a similar kind of “democracy” to the one that we have to endure today, not “true” demokratia.

Winding forward a century or so from Aristotle to the Greek historian Polybius (c. 200 – 118 BCE), who wrestled with the contradictions found in Aristotle’s “Politics,” we get a very dim view of the exercise of power. Polybius stated that the power afforded by wealth corrupts all political systems. Rather like Vilfredo’s circulation theory, this leads to the revolution of political structures.

Monarchies become tyrannies that rule by force and not reason. This leads aristocracies to seize power which are then corrupted and become unjust. Thus democracies rise, but they too are perverted by wealth and become “extreme democracies” led by demagogues. Ultimately creating a new kind of monarchy: the Third Reich, for example.

FEMA Emergency Alert! Hidden Terrible Situations Exposed- Watch the video below to find out the most shocking details!!!

Political history, elite theory and political science reveals that oligarchs rule us. We don’t “elect” any of them, we never have and the idea that any of us have ever lived in a real democracy is a fiction.

More than 2,500 years ago the question was asked: should the power of a privileged group of people far exceed their size as a percentage of the population? The more or less immediate answer, from Plato et al., was a definitive “yes.” Since then, according to “mainstream” academia and a brew of specially selected commentators, with the exception of the Marxists and the anarchists, the question has never really been asked again.

Marxism and particularly anarchism are taboo—there’s a reason for that. What we are left with has moved beyond normative assertions to empirical arguments. All such theoretical musing is based on the fundamental presumption that hierarchical structures are an unavoidable necessity of human society and that these must “inevitably” lead to oligarchies.

None of this is unassailable fact. It is all just opinion which, coincidentally, serves the interests of the oligarchs who have been bankrolling academia for millennia.

Etienne de La Boétie (1530 – 1563) pointed out that political power is not the product of meritocracy but usually the result of a conquest of some kind. Either at the hands of a foreign power, an internal coup, or through the use of political “emergency measures,” in response to some perceived crisis. Force is consistently used and it invariably results in the centralisation of power in a select group or “leader.”

We accept this despotism, not because we don’t like the idea of liberty, but because we have become accustomed to being ruled and expect it.

There are only two certainties in life, right? Death and taxes!

Except one of them isn’t a certainty at all. We just believe that it is because the people who have always taxed us have taught us to believe it. La Boétie pointed out that they have engineered our consent.

This obedience enables our rulers to more easily deploy rhetoric to convince us to accept all manner of travesties. Etienne de La Boétie observed:

Rulers [. . .] never undertake an unjust policy, even one of some importance, without prefacing it with some pretty speech concerning public welfare and common good.

The French economist Claude-Frédéric Bastiat (1801 – 1850) wondered if the suggested social order was any kind of order at all, asking “is it not true that what is most notable in society is the absence of all order?”

Prior to the pseudopandemic, the oligarchs’ pharmaceutical corporations—promoted by governments as our saviours from the so-called crisis that the oligarchs’ organisations and academic institutions declared—were all found guilty of medical, scientific and financial fraud. These rulings had no impact upon them whatsoever. When instructed by the government and the oligarch owned media, the people queued up to be injected with the oligarch’s experimental potions  concocted by some of the most untrustworthy organisations on the planet.

The international monetary and financial system is overseen by a bank that is acknowledged to have laundered Nazi gold stolen from the Jews during the Holocaust. War criminals, who lied to deceive both the public and legislatures to support illegal wars that killed millions, habitually deliver well received speeches at gala events and are frequently feted by the oligarch’s media as they continue to give us their “advice.”

The oligarchs, who lead this global system, start wars, loan the money they conjured up from nowhere to the combatant nations, then swoop upon the aftermath—with their banking corporations and their “debt restructuring plans”—to hoover up all the remaining assets for pennies. They then force the same countries to spend the money they lent them on ludicrously expensive reconstruction contracts, thus enabling their engineering corporations to profit from rebuilding the nation that they destroyed with their armaments corporations.

What sort of order is that? Where is the alleged rule of law?

Inevitable Oligarchy?

Aristotle considered a rule of law to be a “virtue.” For it to have value he thought that it must be moral, capable of administering fair justice to all. It should also be flexible and able to adapt to changing circumstances:

There are two parts of good government; one is the actual obedience of citizens to the laws, the other part is the goodness of the laws which they obey.

Like Aristotle, Bastiat recognised that the law means more than just words written on bits of paper. However, he questioned the assumption that, without the law of government, humanity would start raping, pillaging and killing each other with abandon:

Resistance to such acts would manifest itself in fact even if specific laws against them were lacking, [. . .] this resistance is a general law of humanity. [. . .] It is a far cry from a social order founded on the general laws of humanity to an artificial, contrived, and invented order that does not take these laws into account or denies them or scorns them—an order, in a word, such as some of our modern schools of thought would, it seems, impose upon us.

These “general laws of humanity” form the basis for our social interactions. This is the Natural Law that we all innately obey regardless of the additional “contrived” laws written by governments on behalf of oligarchs.

Lysander Spooner (1808 – 1887) explained why Natural Law is all we need to live in peace:

Through all time, so far as history informs us, wherever mankind have attempted to live in peace with each other, both the natural instincts, and the collective wisdom of the human race, have acknowledged and prescribed, as an indispensable condition, obedience to this one only universal obligation: viz., that each should live honestly towards every other. The ancient maxim makes the sum of a man’s legal duty to his fellow men to be simply this: “To live honestly, to hurt no one, to give to every one his due.” This entire maxim is really expressed in the single words, to live honestly; since to live honestly is to hurt no one, and give to every one his due.

We only need look at world events to appreciate that the rule of oligarchs doesn’t deliver either peace or justice. It is a worthless “social order” that, if it exists at all, no one needs. It is a so-called “order” from which only oligarchs benefit.

We can also study the principles of Natural Law to realise that the written laws of government, that form the so-called “legal system,” do not concern themselves with moral justice. They merely protect the interests of the oligarchs and are used to subjugate us—lawfare. But we already have Natural Law and no need of these “rules.”

We also know that the thing we call “democracy” is not demokratia. It is perfectly possible for us to create a “social order” which has a real rule of Natural Law, administered by us, using trial by jury as required.

So where is the claimed necessity for the rule of oligarchs? The elite theorists allege that large scale organisations won’t function unless the resources they need aren’t meted out by the oligarchs. This is complete nonsense.

The Scottish Natural Law philosopher Adam Smith (1723 – 1790), in “The Wealth of Nations,” explained how the human desire to serve their own self-interest, in the face of competition from others, led to an economic structure that didn’t need any order imposed upon it. Human nature was the “invisible hand” that created spontaneous order in free markets.

Smith’s fellow philosopher of the Scottish Enlightenment, Adam Ferguson (1723 – 1816), noted that spontaneous order was “the result of human action but not of human design.” Later the economist Friedrich Hayek (F. A Hayak 1899 – 1992), building on the idea of spontaneous order, explored pricing in a competitive free market is a means of communication.

Price “signalled,” to both the producer and the consumer, the shifting underlying costs of materials and production. Left unfettered by interfering oligarchs, this enabled human beings to cooperate, producing the highly complex systems we are familiar with today, without any control from a superfluous oligarchy.

Spontaneous order is a reality, as exemplified in the wonderful 1958 essay “I Pencil” by Leonard E. Read (1898 – 1983). Later extolled by the economist Milton Friedman (1912 – 2006).

In “I Pencil,” Read examined how the humble pencil is made. The manufacturing process requires a vast global network. Yet nowhere in this sprawling international supply chain is anyone compelled to do anything.

From the first person perspective of the pencil, Read wrote:

Neither the worker in the oil field nor the chemist nor the digger of graphite or clay nor any who mans or makes the ships or trains or trucks nor the one who runs the machine that does the knurling on my bit of metal nor the president of the company performs his singular task because he wants me. [. . .] Their motivation is other than me. Perhaps it is something like this: Each of these millions sees that he can thus exchange his tiny know-how for the goods and services he needs or wants. [. . .] There is a fact still more astounding: The absence of a master mind, of anyone dictating or forcibly directing these countless actions which bring me into being. No trace of such a person can be found. Instead, we find the Invisible Hand at work.

This is how most of our “global economy” functions. To those, like the elite theorists and the oligarchs, who say that spontaneous order is impossible, we can safely say: we know it work because we use it every day. It is how most human interactions already operate.

So what is this ridiculous idea that we need a bunch of violent robber barons to hoard all the resources so that they can control when and where we are allowed to use them? On what planet is it “inevitable” that a tiny clique of entirely self-appointed rulers simply has to command, not only the planet’s economy and its monetary system, but its distribution networks and political processes too?

Imagine the explosion in technological innovation if research and development wasn’t controlled by oligarchs. Think about the genuine advances in medicine and healthcare if oligarchs didn’t own the whole sector and weren’t running it for their own ends. Consider the solutions we would find to the many problems we face if academics, scientists, engineers, philosophers, architects, teachers, builders, journalists and everyone else in society was free to explore their interests and their passions and talents without having to work towards an artificial agenda created to serve the ambitions of the parasite class.

Despite everything they have done to us, and continue to do, we have no right to harm the oligarchs. Where crimes have been committed they should face justice, just like the rest of us. But that justice needs to be better than any justice we could every expect from them. Otherwise what have we achieved?

The biggest lie we have swallowed is that the oligarch is special—the “elite.” They are not, they are just human beings exactly the same as the rest of us, with all the same qualities and failings.

Aristotle and Polybius understood that the problem is, and has always been, that great wealth empowers people politically. When immeasurably wealthy people act in their own self interests what is their purpose? It cannot be simply to accrue more wealth. Why do you want more of something you already have in excessive abundance.

The oligarchs self-interest is served by extending their power. This isn’t an argument against wealth, it is an argument against a political system led by those whose primary goal is to control and exploit everyone else.

Collectively, we are equally responsible for our oppression at the hands of oligarchs. We have passively allowed them to rule from behind the curtain while knowing full-well they were there.

We cannot absolve ourselves of our responsibility for what they have done. Nor can we avoid the responsibility to end the parasite class’ pernicious system, any more than we can exonerate ourselves from our duty to construct a better one.

You’ll Understand Everything After Watching This VIDEO! 

What Will Happen Next

“The price of tram rides and beef, theatre tickets, and school, newspapers and haircuts, sugar and bacon, is going up every week. As a result, no one knows how long their money will last, and people are living in constant fear, thinking of nothing but eating and drinking, buying and selling.” — Eugeni Xammar, Spanish journalist in Berlin, February 1923.

What’s worse than an all-out financial collapse?  We’ve spoken a lot about economic collapses on this channel, but there is something worse than an all-out collapse hitting America and the world, and it is worsening by the day.  It’s inflation.  Typically, inflation is contained in one country or a group of closely intertwined nations. Normally, we don’t see inflation coupled with so many external forces coming together in a perfect storm- pandemics, lockdowns, an energy crisis, supply chain disruptions, and so forth.  This isn’t the first global inflationary crisis, but it is the first with these modern fiscal controls, exchanges, and an intricately woven global supply chain.  The inflation we are about to see worldwide is unique, and even expert economists readily confess they have seen nothing like it and cannot accurately say where or how it will end.

You have to realize that global inflation will mean more than just paying a dollar ten for the same goods that you paid a dollar for just a few months before.  An inflation threat at this level has the potential to alter the economies of nations fundamentally.  It threatens every aspect of our world from food, to land ownership, to government stability, to retirement plans, to simply surviving.  Here we will explore how this inflation isn’t local to your country but a global problem right now, how we don’t have the tools to avert it, what is going to happen, and what you still have a little time to do to encourage your survival through it.  Let’s explore what’s going on…

Please consider subscribing to our newsletter to give you updates and member-specific content. 

A GLOBAL PROBLEM

Though many would turn their finger of blame on Biden, Merkel, Johnson, Macron, Putin, Jinping, Morrison, or insert the name of your leader here, the inflation crisis we are facing is much broader than one leader’s mismanagement.  It’s much more significant than one country’s failings.  It is far less contained and can’t be confined, this time, to one country’s or one region’s borders.  Global inflation is so bad right now that many leading economists are revising their long-term projections and bracing for an extended, worldwide economic decline.  It’s worse than expected and hasn’t yet been fully realized.  Some economies around the world will likely fail as a result.  In any massive economic shift, as we see here, there will be winners, and there will be losers.

To massively oversimplify what inflation is to understand it better, basically, climbing prices results in lower purchasing power.  It’s the same basket of goods or the same service, but now it costs more, and you make the same or less, as some businesses make up for the loss of profit by slashing worker wages.  Typically, inflation is measured using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  This is a standardized group of goods (food, shelter, energy, and other items) that provides a baseline for comparison.  Every single index has been steadily rising.  The energy index alone has risen 24.8% over the last 12 months.  One of the most ominous indicators that an enormous inflationary storm is brewing on the horizon is that inflation is usually confined to one country or group of economically intertwined companies.  That’s not the case with this storm.  Even before the current supply chain and energy crisis, global inflation was projected at 3.5%– A number that is woefully in need of correction just a few months later.  In fact, Trading Economics data from last month put the G20 nation’s average inflation rate at 7.66%.  Even if you take out the troublesome economies of Argentina and Turkey, the G18 remaining countries average almost a 5% inflation increase.

No matter where you live, you likely are already feeling the effects.  Gasoline in the US is up over 30% since the beginning of the year, and natural gas prices in Europe have soared 400%.  The CPIs for over 100 countries worldwide are up just over the last quarter.  The cost of everything is going up, carts are getting smaller, and the world still struggles to find its economic footing after the lasting effects of COVID.

AN EMPTY TOOLBOX 

Typically, to ease inflation, the Federal Reserve would simply raise rates to stave it off.  Because the government has borrowed so much, increased debt, printed so much money, and kept rates forced low for so long, there isn’t anywhere they can turn.  The toolbox of tools to control inflation is empty.  If the Fed were to raise rates now in an already staggering economy struggling to get to its feet, bond prices, housing prices, stock markets would all falter, possibly even collapse.  

When the US defaults on bonds because the interest is too high to continue rolling over into debt and the country’s credit rating is slashed, a spiraling collapse starts moving and accelerating.  For years, the Fed’s only tool to fight economic collapse was to lower rates and fuel the debt party.  You can’t take the patient off the ventilator if he can’t breathe independently, yet there are no more tools available.  So, most governments worldwide are simply holding onto their chairs and bracing for the wild ride in hopes of discovering some, as yet unknown off-ramp or in the hopes that the current gears and valves all maxed out will hold up under the strain.

Again, though, this isn’t a uniquely American problem.  Natural gas prices have soared 400% in Europe this year as they brace for a brutal winter.  China refused coal from Australia and massively ramped up its production, causing prices for coal to plummet.  That would be great, but most developed countries have been moving away from coal for decades, so the lower coal prices do them little good.  Global supply-chain issues from labor to raw material shortages to shipping containers, port traffic jams, trains, and truckers persist.  While it does appear that most of the world is emerging from its third wave of the Coronavirus and the numbers of vaccinations is increasing, some countries like the United Kingdom, Russia, Germany, Poland, and the Netherlands still struggle to get their numbers down.  Corporations will seek to maintain profits by slashing labor and passing costs to consumers.  The world is under a dark cloud of an inflationary storm, the power of which remains unknown.  Any individual country’s efforts to alter the course, tweak their economy, or insulate themselves, aren’t enough to change their fate.

WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT?

HOUSING 

The shelter index indicates that we are about to see increases in rents and houses skyrocketing in price, especially in suburban and urban settings.  But don’t think you can sell high and buy up cheap farmland because the cost of farmland is going up as the wealthy and corporations snatch it up as part of their portfolios.  The current consumer faces poor job opportunities that require extensive experience or education while wages have been stagnant for over two decades.  The everyday consumer faces ever-increasing healthcare costs and these higher rates of inflation.  The cost of building a home has gone up considerably.  For every six homes constructed right now, ten families are looking to buy a home.  The shelter inflation rate in the US is up, and it’s up 26% in Canada.  Housing in some major cities around the world will become out of reach for the average person.  Corporations seeking to secure stable investments are in direct competition with consumers.  At the current rate, investors will one day own most homes because land ownership remains the tool for the rich to stabilize their portfolios in turbulent markets.  For more on that, see my video on why Bezos, Gates, and Turner are now farmers.  I will link to that at the end of this video.  

Expect the number of homeless to increase.  Expect to see more people engaged in the van life, moving into micro homes and apartments, trying to buy land, or setting up a homestead.  If you aren’t in a home already, expect prices to continue to increase and will likely become out of reach for the average consumer in the not so distant future.  Expect that many will have to move in with extended family, friends or make some other group cohabiting plans to find a livable situation for themselves.  Suppose the real estate bubble never pops, as many leading economists are beginning to realize, because institutional investors with deeper pockets continue to buy up homes away from average consumers.  Let me repeat this last point because it’s important you understand.  Many in this community are anticipating the housing market to burst similar to 2008.  But an even worse scenario that is playing out is that house prices are increasing rapidly as corporations are finding that houses provide a reliable cash flow when yields in the typical investment markets are diminishing.  In that case, many will be forced to rent, downsize, or find themselves on the streets even while some investor-owned properties are vacant.  As governments turn to higher tax bills and prices go up, how long will some who are comfortably in their homes now reach a point where they can no longer afford their tax bill?  You will start to hear more stories of regular people who have lived in their paid-off homes for years, losing their homes in retirement to taxes.

FOOD

Expect the number of people growing their own food, making their own alcohol, soap, cheese, and other items to increase.  The demand for raw materials and equipment needed for these endeavors will also increase.  We had a little glimpse of that when under lockdown, so many people explored canning for the first time.  In the coming months and probably through next year, you will see the contents of your shopping cart getting less and less while the totals at checkout will stay the same or increase.  Expect that the average consumer may not afford some staple items or processed foods that require labor, packaging, and distribution.  Any shortages or price increases that lead to any panic buying of any kind will only fuel the fire further.  It’s also worth noting that when food insecurity becomes an issue in a nation, that nation is setting itself up for failure as the common person will only endure a lack of food for only so long.

If food inflation is contained at just 10% over the next year, your $100 will only buy you $90 in groceries at the same time your rent, utilities, fuel, and everything else is going up, and your income has stayed the same or decreased.  When it comes to food, the unprepared will have to learn to get by on less and will compete for anything in abundance, snapping up the available supply of many foods.  And, if you have unknowingly slipped into the habit of buying foods out of season, as most consumers have, expect at least some of those items to no longer make it to your stores.  After the rising labor costs, packaging, and transport, it might not be as profitable to ship grapes from Chile, asparagus from Peru, avocados from Mexico, sugar from Central America, or coffee from Brazil.  Agricultural exports have barely maintained a spot above imports, but that may flip as corporate farmers have difficulty exporting their products for high costs when local consumers demand lower prices for the same product at home.  Corporations will sell to the highest bidder even if the local population is hungry.  Expect staple food items to cost more across the board and around the world.  

ENERGY

The cost of producing and delivering energy to you will continue to rise.  Heating and cooling your home will cost more.  Trying to go solar will cost more.  Even buying gasoline will cost more.  The only solution is to try and consume less.  While corporations struggle to maintain profits, they will often declare their energy consumption emergencies to justify it.  All those alleged peak hours do, however, is allow them to make up profits by quadrupling rates.  The prices for energy-intensive metals like nickel, steel, silicone are all skyrocketing.  Synthetic fertilizer, mostly made from natural gas, has blasted up 300%, and that only further feeds the food price increases.  Only some form of government intervention that mandates large-scale power cuts and rationing to specific sectors can curb current consumer demand and temper gas prices. Still, in a climate where distrust of government is at an all-time high, that’s not likely to happen.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

There isn’t much you can do not to feel the impact of rising costs on everything, everywhere.  Unless you are completely off-grid and self-sufficient, you will feel the effects.  If you are prepping, you will be able to lessen the impact of global inflation.  When you build a shelf-stable supply of food for a disaster, you are also providing yourself a means to make it through a period of high inflation.  Prepping lessens the impact of global inflation in all aspects of your life.  Turn to the basics of food, water, shelter, and energy.  Make the changes now, out of choice, rather than when the herd makes the same choices out of necessity and drives up costs further as a result.

Such global strain on economies can result in massive political upheaval, civil unrest, even regime changes, as people are both desperate and myopically view global problems as locally caused.  Make sure you have a security plan in place and have at least some plan should the need arise for you to bug out.  Build your network and connections now.  That can be a family you can rely on or just a collective of gardeners that all share their various harvests.  The best way to stay out of the national and global change and policy shifts is to get local with your resources.  It won’t matter if there is a shortage of eggs, honey, chicken, milk, butter, berries, or bacon if you have taken the time to find local sources.

Learn to forage for or grow something.  If you haven’t found, harvested, and cooked a puffball mushroom, maybe you should go out this weekend and try instead of your usual entertainment.  If you haven’t planted some sunchokes, a small container garden, or even a microgreens garden in your kitchen or apartment, the window to do so is closing.  Learn that skill that can lead to a side job and more income for you or will simply just save you money over the long haul.  You will be glad you did if the inflation continues to rise, but you won’t be able to when the masses are also trying to.  The reality is, when the forecasters see global inflation and none of them are forecasting an end to it, people will either have to do for themselves or join the desperate masses and go without.

As simple as it may sound, take the time now to focus on your mental and physical health.  Those are your number one preps that will help you in all other areas.  We all know people who say year after year that this is the year they will make a change.  We know many problems of physical and mental health are a result of lifestyle and personal choices.  We also know that when we are stripped of everything, all that remains are our bodies and our minds.  So, take the steps now to make these most critical preps as strong as they can be.  That can be as simple as getting in the habit of walking or hiking, foraging, or meditation.  It doesn’t have to be a dramatic change.  You can start in the smallest of ways so long as you make efforts every day, but you have to start.  Learn a skill, go on your walkabout, remove toxic people and things from your life and get a breath of fresh air.

Finally, take a hard look at your financial resources.  Live your life now like you’re on limited funds.  You might pass on the luxury purchases in favor of getting a few extra supplies here and there.  This isn’t an investment channel, and I don’t offer any financial advice.  That said, it would seem to make sense to look at your current spending habits and determine where you can modify those habits to meet the new realities of the rising cost of everything.  As I said, there will be both winners and losers from both the inflation and the recovery.  If a chunk of your budget goes to entertainment, it might be time to cultivate a hobby that will keep you entertained and produce for yourself and save you money.  If you’re close to retirement, now might be the time to make sure all your retirement investments aren’t solely in the stock market.  

CONCLUSION

So what can you do?  You can learn to do it for yourself.  That’s the essence of prepping, in my opinion.  Sure, preparing for the massive disasters that can suddenly plunge our world into desperation and chaos is an excellent reason to prep.  For many, that is the sole reason.  Global inflation isn’t a disaster that overcomes us in a day.  The mechanisms that lead to it have been smoldering in the background for months, years, even decades.  The catalyst, the fuel that ignites a more significant fire, like a pandemic, lockdowns, and supply chain failures, is just the final piece to cast us out of our comfort zones and into unchartered territory.  That’s where we are today, on the cusp of a slowly unfolding disaster called inflation.  We can neither see its top edge nor know how dramatically it will impact our daily lives.  We don’t even have a sense of the whole during these early days.  The only thing we know right now with certainty is that we are only at the beginning of it, and we have few tools to prevent us from flying headlong into it.

We are receiving an unsettling wave of reports from readers in Georgia, Florida, Texas, and Kansas City describing the same disturbing phenomenon, a loud humming or droning sound in the ears, often accompanied by dizziness, headaches, disorientation, memory fog, and even emotional swings.

These are not random complaints. They are coming in from multiple states, spanning hundreds of miles, yet carrying eerily similar descriptions.

A persistent low-frequency hum or vibration in the ears

No obvious external sound source

Episodes lasting minutes to hours

Symptoms sometimes worsening at night or during specific hours

In some cases, sudden anxiety spikes, intrusive thoughts, or violent imagery

Why This Matters

We have reason to believe that this is not “in people’s heads” and it is not a coincidence.

Theories emerging from independent researchers and whistleblowers point toward directed frequency devices. These can be stationary, mobile, or satellite-based, capable of targeting specific geographic areas or even individuals.

Such devices have been used historically and experimentally for:

PsyOps and psychological manipulation, influencing emotions, behaviors, and thought patterns

Subverting awareness of Truth, fogging critical thinking, reducing focus, and dulling discernment

Triggering MK Ultra-style programming, conditioning individuals for specific actions, including potential mass violence or chaos events

A Chilling Possibilit

The timing is suspicious. As truth continues to surface at breakneck speed, we are now seeing tools of disruption and destabilization deployed not in foreign war zones, but right here at home.

If the reports are accurate, these frequency pulses could serve dual purposes.

1. Suppress the awakening of the population by dulling clarity and spreading confusion
2. Activate programmed individuals to create the kind of random chaos events that justify new government controls

Adding to the urgency, drones are still being spotted around the nuclear power plant in Salem, New Jersey, an alarming and underreported development. Whether this activity is related to surveillance, sabotage planning, or frequency transmission is unclear, but its persistence should raise red flags nationwide.

What You Can Do Right Now

Document everything. Note the time, date, location, symptoms, and any environmental details.

Talk to others nearby to see if they are experiencing similar effects.

Check for patterns such as times of day, weather changes, or nearby events.

Reduce exposure. If possible, move to a different area temporarily to see if symptoms ease.

Stay grounded. These technologies work best when the mind is in a state of fear or confusion.

Practical Tip: A Faraday cage can block certain frequencies from reaching devices and in some cases, the human body. If the noise becomes overwhelming, try wrapping yourself in a foil emergency blanket available at most outdoor or survival supply stores. This is a long shot, but if the noises calm or lessen, it may indicate you are being hit with a targeted frequency. It is worth trying for your own comfort and safety.

We will continue monitoring these reports closely. If you have experienced this humming noise, the accompanying symptoms, or have visual confirmation of drone activity especially near sensitive infrastructure, please reach out through secure channels. Your accounts could be critical in mapping and confirming the reach of these operations.

Stay aware. Stay anchored. The battle is no longer just for hearts and minds, it is for the very frequencies of your thoughts.

Sanctuaries or Shields?

For centuries, churches in America have stood as sacred institutions, places of guidance, repentance, and hope. Beneath the marble columns and stained-glass windows, stories of abuse, silence, and systemic failure have unraveled public trust in some of the country’s most respected spiritual leaders.

More than just isolated incidents, a pattern emerges: abuse covered up, victims dismissed, and institutions choosing self-preservation over transparency. And in the darkest corners of public imagination, and conspiracy forums, even more sinister acts are known; underground tunnels, trafficking rings, underground bunkers, reports of underground cities and covert alliances with figures of power.

When money and influence collide with unchecked power, it becomes possible, even easy, to look away.

What We Know – The Documented Failures

The Catholic Church’s Reckoning

In 2002, The Boston Globe’s Spotlight team unearthed what the Church had tried to hide: decades of abuse across the Archdiocese of Boston, shielded by a culture of silence. Since then, similar reports have emerged across the country.

In 2018, a Pennsylvania grand jury detailed abuse by over 300 priests and identified more than 1,000 victims, calling it a “systematic cover-up.” Survivors told stories of spiritual manipulation, threats of damnation, and the use of confession as a tool of grooming.

Despite Vatican policies introduced in the aftermath, implementation remains inconsistent. Some dioceses publish lists of credibly accused priests. Others remain opaque.

Evangelical and Protestant Churches: A Quieter Crisis

In 2019, The Houston Chronicle exposed the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) for its widespread sexual abuse problem, identifying more than 700 victims and over 380 pastors and volunteers accused of misconduct.

Due to the decentralized structure of many evangelical churches, background checks are inconsistent, and expelled pastors can move freely to new congregations with little to no scrutiny. Survivors report being silenced, shunned, or even blamed.

🔥 Famous Names and Familiar Patterns

• Tony Alamo: Convicted in 2009 for transporting underage girls across state lines for sex, the once-influential evangelist ran a multimillion-dollar religious compound. He used scripture to justify his abuse.

• Doug Phillips: Founder of Vision Forum Ministries, accused of grooming and sexual abuse, settled out of court. His teachings on “biblical patriarchy” shaped thousands of Christian homeschooling households.

• Eddie Long: A megachurch pastor accused by multiple young men of sexual coercion. Cases were settled, and Long denied wrongdoing, but the damage to his ministry’s legacy remains.

These aren’t fringe figures. They were broadcast into homes, led nationwide conferences, and held political sway.

The Appearance of Respectability

Investigators and survivors repeatedly describe a disturbing pattern: abusers often surround themselves with legitimacy. Political endorsements, television appearances, charity initiatives, and close ties to law enforcement or elected officials all contribute to a shield of public trust.

This is not incidental. It’s strategic.

“The more power they gain, the more invisible they become,” says Jane Monahan, a former church employee who blew the whistle on abuse in a Texas congregation. “They donate to police departments, invite mayors to pray. By the time a child speaks up, no one believes them.”

In trafficking investigations globally, not just in religious cases, it’s common to find that someone with political, religious, or celebrity status serves as a front, giving operations the illusion of credibility and moral authority.

The Economics of Exploitation

The financial scale of human trafficking often surprises even seasoned investigators.

According to the International Labour Organization, trafficking for sexual exploitation generates over $99 billion annually, nearly double the global drug trade in some regions.

Unlike drugs, which are sold once, a child can be sold multiple times a day, making each victim far more profitable over time.

This reality drives home a chilling equation: the younger the victim, the higher the market value. For traffickers and those who protect them, the industry offers not just wealth, but leverage.

• Money buys power

• Power buys influence

• Influence ensures silence

When such profits flow into religious institutions, whether knowingly or through criminal infiltration, the lines between sacred mission and shadow economy become dangerously blurred.

What It Would Take to Hide It

While no direct evidence is known by the public, that ties major U.S. churches to trafficking rings involving tunnels or smuggling operations, survivors point to how easily it happens given the right conditions.

Financial Opacity

Most churches are tax-exempt and receive large, often untraceable, cash donations. With few legal requirements for disclosure or external audits, it’s difficult to follow the money.

Structural Protection

Top-down authority, internal investigations, and social pressure to avoid “dividing the body of Christ” create a natural shield against scrutiny. Whistleblowers are often demonized.

Weaponized Theology

Many survivors describe how abusers used scripture to justify exploitation, or to silence them afterward. Forgiveness is demanded. Speaking out is seen as rebellion.

The Power Loop

The scale of trafficking revenue means more than criminal profit, it enables protection:

• Donations to law enforcement or political campaigns

• Legal firepower to suppress lawsuits

• PR machines that spin accusations as persecution

What’s Being Done – And What Isn’t

✅ Some Progress

• The SBC has created a sex abuse hotline and published a list of known offenders.

• Certain Catholic dioceses now post names of credibly accused clergy.

• Independent churches are beginning to partner with third-party auditors.

❌ Not Enough

• Statutes of limitations still limit justice for many survivors.

• Most churches investigate internally, with no legal oversight.

• Victims often face stigma, disbelief, and exile from their spiritual communities.

Faith Demands Accountability

We don’t need tunnels or urban legends to justify concern. The facts are already disturbing enough: widespread abuse, repeated cover-ups, and multi-billion-dollar incentives to keep quiet.

Churches are meant to be sanctuaries. But when wealth, secrecy, and power combine, they can become fortresses instead, protecting perpetrators, not the people they serve.

If trust is to be restored, it won’t come through sermons or soundbites. It will come through radical transparency, survivor-led reform, and the moral courage to speak truth from the pulpit, even when it shakes the altar. Soon a shaking will occur, that wealth cannot stop.

“Take for yourself a red heifer without defect…” — Numbers 19:2

Earlier this month, on a quiet hill in Samaria, a red heifer was slaughtered and burned under rabbinic supervision. This was an event unseen in Israel for nearly 2,000 years. Officially, it was a “practice run,” symbolic, educational, and a logistical rehearsal.

But what if it wasn’t?

What if what we witnessed was not a symbolic rehearsal, but the first real step toward restoring Temple worship? What if this marked the opening act of a prophetic drama, one whose next scene could involve not only the construction of the Third Temple, but also the rise of the Antichrist?

A Ceremony With Prophetic Weight

In Numbers 19, the Torah outlines the strange and sacred ritual of the red heifer, burned to produce ashes used to purify those who have come into contact with death. These ashes are essential for achieving the ritual purity required to enter the Temple.

This ritual has not been performed since the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. According to Jewish tradition, there have only been nine valid red heifer sacrifices throughout history. The tenth, according to rabbinic commentary, will occur in the days of the Messiah.

So when Israeli religious authorities quietly burn a red heifer in 2025, it becomes difficult to see it as merely symbolic. Even if they insist the animal was disqualified, the prophetic momentum behind the event is very real.

What If It Wasn’t Practice?

Let’s consider for a moment what might be true behind the scenes.

What if the red heifer was actually fit according to biblical standards? What if the claim of “disqualification” was a strategic public label, designed to avoid political or religious backlash? What if the ceremony was conducted not as a dry run, but as a quiet and deliberate first step?

If that were the case, then this event is not just notable, it is historic.

A true red heifer sacrifice would mean that the long-awaited purification ritual has been reinstated. And according to both Jewish and Christian prophecy, this could initiate a chain of events that changes the world.

Are We Witnessing the Ushering in of the Antichrist?

This is where Christian eschatology becomes particularly urgent.

In 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, Paul describes the “man of lawlessness,” understood by many as the Antichrist. He will one day sit in the rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem, proclaiming himself to be God. However, that Temple cannot be rebuilt until the site, and the priests, are ritually purified using the ashes of a red heifer.

In other words, without the red heifer, there can be no Temple. And without the Temple, the Antichrist cannot rise in the way Scripture describes.

If this ceremony was the real thing, then it could be the first domino to fall in a prophetic sequence. First, the red heifer sacrifice restores purity. Then, Temple Mount preparations accelerate. Eventually, the Third Temple is rebuilt. And finally, the Antichrist appears, deceives many, and desecrates the sanctuary with what Scripture calls the “abomination of desolation.”

This raises the question, are we witnessing the rise of the Messiah, or the rise of his counterfeit?

This question will become increasingly difficult to ignore.

A Tipping Point Moment

Even if we accept the official story that this was only a rehearsal, the spiritual and psychological significance of the event cannot be overstated. What was once confined to theology books and prophecy conferences is now unfolding in real time, on Israeli soil, and in our generation.

We are entering a period in which prophetic symbols are being activated, religious intentions are being backed by real-world action, and the distinction between preparation and fulfillment is becoming less clear.

Whether you are a believer in biblical prophecy or a skeptical observer of religious movements, one fact remains. Something historic just happened.

A red heifer was burned in Israel. Regardless of how it is being publicly framed, a threshold has been crossed.

So we must ask again, what if it wasn’t just practice? And even more urgently, are we now seeing the stage being set for the appearance of the Antichrist?

Because if that is the case, then the next chapter will not be a rehearsal. It will be the book of Revelation coming to life.

What do you think? Are we closer to the Messiah, or on the brink of deception? Let’s discuss in the comments.