Home

1. Central Banks and the BIS

At the top of the financial pyramid sits the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland , the “central bank of central banks.” It acts as a clearinghouse for financial operations between major nations and secretly controls monetary policy for over 60 central banks worldwide.
They operate with complete legal immunity from national governments and taxation.

Central banks themselves , like the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England, and others , print fiat currency at will, control interest rates, and manipulate economic conditions to serve the interests of the elite, not the public.

2. The Old Banking Families

Names like:

• Rothschild
• Rockefeller
• Warburg
• Morgan
• Vanderbilt

These families accumulated obscene amounts of wealth through monopolies on banking, oil, railroads, and shipping during the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries , and much of that wealth was quietly transitioned into trusts, holding companies, and offshore accounts.

Estimates of the Rothschild family’s total wealth range from hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars, though it’s nearly impossible to trace because it’s hidden in foundations, trusts, and behind nominal ownership.

3. Tax Havens & Offshore Accounts

According to a study by the Tax Justice Network, the global elite hide $21 to $32 trillion in offshore accounts , in places like:

• Cayman Islands
• Luxembourg
• Switzerland
• Singapore
• Panama

This hoarded wealth escapes taxation, public scrutiny, and accountability.

4. Black Budget & Missing Trillions

The U.S. government alone has been caught “losing track” of trillions:

• In 2001, Donald Rumsfeld admitted the Pentagon couldn’t account for $2.3 trillion.
• Catherine Austin Fitts, former HUD Assistant Secretary, has documented the “missing money” schemes siphoning public funds into off-books projects , believed by many to fund secret space programs, underground bases, and elite escape plans.

5. Land, Media, and Pharma Ownership

A handful of investment firms, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, now collectively own controlling stakes in:

• Over 90% of U.S. media
• Most pharmaceutical companies
• Key military contractors
• Major agricultural companies (including those producing GMOs and pesticides)

They also control massive real estate portfolios , quietly buying up farmland, housing, and critical infrastructure worldwide.

6. The Vatican’s Hidden Fortune

The Vatican Bank holds untold billions in gold, real estate, and art. Documents have shown it profited from wars, colonial plundering, and financial schemes. Rumors persist about secret underground vaults loaded with treasures taken during centuries of conquest and conflict.

Why Is This Hoarded Wealth a Problem?

Because it’s not idle money — it’s used to:

• Control governments through campaign funding and lobbying.
• Manipulate markets via hedge funds and currency speculation.
• Fund social engineering through foundations (think Gates, Soros, and Rockefeller initiatives).
• Suppress new technology that could liberate humanity (free energy, advanced medicine, etc.).
• Drive wars and migration crises to destabilize nations and consolidate power.

And while the average person struggles with inflation, debt, and taxes , these entities hoard enough wealth to end global poverty dozens of times over.

The idea of a global elite controlling humanity through debt, manipulation, and hoarded wealth isn’t a theory. It’s a fact that history’s empires have always functioned this way. The names and technology have changed, but the strategy hasn’t.

The most shocking video can be found below.

Liberal’s hidden agenda: more than just your guns…

… the impending collapse of the US food supply system
will steal the food from your kids’ tables…

Watch this video below to find out the great secrets hidden by the government.

Source- anonymous8675309.substack.com

While Spain, Portugal, and southern France are still trying to recover from the worst power outage in their history, the mysteries surrounding the collapse of the energy system continue to grow. On Monday, April 28, at 12:33 p.m., everything seemed normal. The power grid was operating with absolute stability, according to Eduardo Prieto, Director of Services for the Operation of the Electric Grid. But in just five seconds, two generating plants suddenly went offline—one after the other—causing a massive loss of 15 gigawatts, equivalent to 60% of the energy consumed at the time.

Until now, authorities had pointed to a sudden technical failure as the most likely cause, although they did not rule out any hypothesis. However, recent documents reveal that Brussels had already issued a unilateral alert weeks ago, urging European citizens to prepare a “72-hour emergency kit,” useful both in dealing with a widespread power outage and in a war scenario.

Last March, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, made public an unusual recommendation: “all European citizens should have a basic survival kit in case of an energy emergency or even an armed conflict”. This message, issued without further public explanation, was interpreted by many as a preventive measure against possible consequences arising from the escalating war in Ukraine, including Russian cyberattacks or hybrid actions against critical infrastructure.

This detail cannot be ignored. If Brussels recommended this months in advance, was it anticipating an event of this magnitude? And if so, why wasn’t a more advanced protection protocol activated on the peninsula’s electricity grid? Why wasn’t a specific alert issued about vulnerabilities in the system? Did Brussels know something that the governments of Madrid and Lisbon didn’t want to divulge? Was Europe anticipating an event that, from within or without, was being planned?.

What we do know is that Red Eléctrica has flatly denied the possibility of a cyberattack, while Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez insisted that “no hypothesis can be ruled out,” including cyber sabotage. This tension between technical bodies and the political establishment is no coincidence. Furthermore, Transport Minister Óscar Puente asserted days later that “the system’s security mechanisms responded appropriately,” but this directly undermines the severity of the collapse. How can a response that results in the total isolation of the peninsular electricity system and affects hospitals, trains, airports, and essential services be defined as “adequate”?.

Patterns and Secret Codes

It all began at noon, in a seemingly banal moment, but for those of us who pay attention to the signs, it turns out to be much more than that. According to President Sánchez’s statement at a press conference, it was at 12:33. But, as always, those of us who know how to read between the lines are not surprised by his words; we understand the hidden message, the code they reveal through numbers and strategic dates.

For many, this may go unnoticed, but those of us who are on the ball know that these actions are always steeped in symbolism. We talk about the lodges, about THEM, those hidden elites who manipulate from the shadows, always with their own calendar, giving us clues with every move. The presence of the number 33—the Masonic number par excellence—at the time, 12:33, is no coincidence. Furthermore, it occurred at 12, a time when we can perform the simple addition of 1 + 2, which equals 3. This number, 333, represents half of 666 and forms patterns that seem to whisper secrets in a coded language. Coincidence?

And let’s not forget that at that same moment, the President mentioned that 15 gigawatts were lost in just 5 seconds. 15, a number that in numerology adds up to 6 (1 + 5 = 6), another number with a strong symbolic charge in Freemasonry and the lodges. And if we add the 5 seconds to the 15 gigawatts, we get a very significant number for THEM: the number 11, which symbolizes sacrifice.

Coincidence? For us, such coincidences don’t exist. They are clues, coded messages that reveal the presence of a hidden agenda, a plan that unfolds with mathematical and symbolic precision, always playing with dates, numbers, and symbols in its secret language.

And chaos ensued

In reality, what many don’t know is that this entire crisis wasn’t simply an accident or a technical failure, but a carefully orchestrated act by those pulling the strings from the shadows. The majority of the population suffered extreme stress, but in reality, this was a deliberate maneuver, a massive control operation that had already been tested months earlier in other regions of South America. Gas stations stopped working instantly, traffic lights caused chaos in large cities, ATMs didn’t work, you couldn’t withdraw money from banks, supermarkets stopped working because the cash registers weren’t working, forcing them to close their doors, you couldn’t buy medicine because pharmacies closed their doors… everything stopped working in an instant, as if a switch had been turned off. Many communities didn’t even have access to water.

Despite this real situation, there was no reason to complain; everything happened naturally and calmly. I watched as people sat on the terraces of bars as if nothing had happened. This is a characteristic of Hispanic philosophy.

Was this all a coincidence?. I know it’s not. The evidence points to coordinated sabotage, a strategy to destabilize and subjugate the population at a key moment. The duration of this crisis varied from a few hours in some places to a full day in others, but the objective was clear: to generate chaos, fear, and dependence. Meanwhile, large hospitals operated on generators, but smaller ones had to close, leaving people without access to medicine and medical care.

Perhaps all of these elements could have been part of a national stress test, or a dress rehearsal for larger events. Some analysts have suggested that the timing of the blackout coincides with secret meetings of senior European defense officials in Brussels, where they were discussing precisely how to respond to hybrid energy crises. The question now is, how long will we continue to allow these hidden powers to manipulate our reality?

False Flag Operation?

A false flag attack consists of simulating a catastrophic event (a cyberattack, internal sabotage, human error, a terrorist attack) using disguised means to blame an external actor and justify subsequent political, military, or economic actions. In other words, making something look like an accident when, in reality, it was planned.

This type of strategy has historically been used to justify invasions, regime changes, and even radical internal reforms under the guise of national security.

From the shadows and with a critical eye, it is not difficult to suspect that the escalating war in southern European countries could be fueled by an orchestrated narrative that points to Russia as responsible for an alleged cyberattack. Everything seems to indicate that behind this backdrop, a major war is brewing between our continent and Russia, a carefully designed strategy to justify a conflict. As we have discussed on previous occasions, all of this appears to be part of a premeditated plan, where human sacrifices become pieces on a global power scale, revealing a reality in which the true interests lie far from protecting nations and closer to maintaining absolute control at the cost of innocent lives.

Official Inconsistencies

The first thing that stands out is the speed with which automated protocols were activated, such as load tracking and isolation from the European system, extreme measures that are only taken in scenarios considered high-risk. Furthermore, the simultaneous disconnection of two power plants raises suspicions about whether this could have been caused by a single failure or a coordinated action.

Red Eléctrica flatly denied that there was a cyberattack, but Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez was clear in stating that “no hypothesis can be ruled out,” including the possibility of cyber sabotage. This tension between technical bodies and the political establishment is no coincidence.

It is also curious that a Portuguese minister immediately blamed Spain without presenting concrete evidence, as if it were a diversionary maneuver. And although he later retracted his statement, this opened the door to geopolitical interpretations that were not entirely unfounded.

Furthermore, the fact that the system has been completely cut off from Europe, cutting off connections with France—one of the key countries in terms of energy security—suggests that someone had access to critical control mechanisms.

A Blackout with Too Many Shadows

Officially, Red Eléctrica’s final conclusions are expected in the coming days. Meanwhile, the country continues with the flickering light and the truth silent. But it is no longer enough to rely on institutional spokespersons who change their versions every hour.

The April 28 blackout not only left tens of millions of people without electricity. It also revealed deep cracks in government transparency, in the security of the energy system, and in the true nature of the chaos that plunged us into darkness.

There are theories suggesting that the cause is not the officially reported loss of two power plants, but rather an overload caused by the addition of new renewable energy plants. However, this claim lacks solid foundation and is not supported by reliable evidence.

Current electrical systems are clearly equipped to handle production levels exceeding demand in many circumstances, and this does not mean that the technicians responsible are naive or inexperienced. On the contrary, the professionals who operate and design these grids fully understand the limits and capabilities of the infrastructure and are constantly working to incorporate new technologies and energy sources that optimize system stability.

It is important to emphasize that excess electricity production, although it may generate certain challenges for the grid, does not automatically lead to a total collapse. Modern grids are designed with multiple control and regulation mechanisms, allowing for effective management of these generation peaks. For example, energy storage technologies, such as high-capacity batteries, are used to help balance supply and demand and smooth out fluctuations. Furthermore, automated control systems continuously adjust production, reducing or increasing generation as needed, in coordination with international agreements and market mechanisms that encourage efficient management of energy resources.

Furthermore, the technicians and engineers who operate these grids not only understand the risks associated with overproduction but are also prepared to incorporate new energy sources, such as solar, wind, or even emerging technologies, without jeopardizing system stability. Constant innovation in grid management, along with the intelligent integration of different energy sources, ensures that current systems can support higher levels of production without the risk of collapse.

It makes no sense that these engineers would ignore the possibility of a grid collapse due to overproduction. Proof of this is found in countless countries that have seamlessly incorporated renewable energy into their electricity grids, such as Germany, Denmark, Finland, Greece, the Netherlands, Sweden, China, etc.

What happened constitutes a deliberate act with a specific objective. In recent years, this type of operation has been carried out in various countries and continents. It would be too obvious if everyone acted simultaneously, which is why they chose to carry it out progressively, step by step.

Was it a simple glitch? I don’t think so. Now, knowing that Brussels warned of a possible massive outage months before the incident, a new suspicion arises: this blackout was not unforeseen, but perhaps expected… and even facilitated.

But it could also have been a smokescreen for something much darker. The only thing that’s certain is that behind this blackout, there are more questions than answers… and a story yet to be told.

While many people are holding their breath about this and wondering if it was a cyber attack that knocked out power, sources tell me this.

• Cause: The outage was confirmed to be caused by a voltage imbalance in the European electricity grid. This imbalance necessitated controlled power cuts to stabilize the network. Additionally, the fire in southwestern France that damaged a key power transmission line contributed significantly to the disruption by affecting electricity exports to Spain and Portugal.
• Impact: The outage severely affected daily life across major cities, including Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon, and Seville. Public transport systems, airports, hospitals, and essential services experienced disruptions, leading to delays, cancellations, and operational challenges.
• Investigations: Spanish and Portuguese authorities continue to investigate the incident. The focus remains on determining the exact technical causes and assessing the potential role of the fire in France as a contributing factor. At this point, a cyber-attack is not suspected.
• Recovery: Efforts to restore power have been underway, with significant progress made in gradually bringing affected regions back online. Collaboration between national electricity operators and energy companies has been crucial in this recovery process.
• Updates: As the situation evolves, updates are being provided by local authorities and electricity operators to keep the public informed about restoration efforts and any further developments related to the incident.

Yesterday we learn that large parts of Spain, Portugal and parts of the south west of France are paralysed as a huge power outage hit both countries. In a millisecond, traffic ground to a halt as traffic ‘lights’ went dark, public transport stopped, hospital’s routine work ground to a halt and people were trapped in lifts. The cause? No one knows, but its accidental of course (raises eyebrows), could it be a ‘cyber-attack’? Was it the fault of the grid operator OR climate change? According to some reports, the narrative appears to be a ‘weather event’. Note my eyebrows are once again in the raised position. The World Economic Forum did warn us after all…Polycrisis, translated means they (those in CONtrol are throwing the kitchen sink at us).

Has the hot weather melted the grid? Interesting to note that in Kuwait they just recorded the hottest day on record at 49’, and their power appears to be up and running perfectly fine. However, here are a couple of genuine reasons which maybe considered and are not being spoken about in the mainstream media or for that matter, alternative media.

1.Solar flares. I have been warning for a few weeks now to watch for impact on earth from solar flares and solar events. Could these have been responsible?

2. Did anyone catch this news. “Spain’s grid ran entirely on renewable energy for the first time on April 16, with wind, solar, and hydro meeting all peninsular electricity demand during a weekday”. FIRST TIME EVER ON RENEWABLES? Don’t suppose that had anything to do with it, I don’t believe in coincidences anymore.

I have kept my ears on the updates to this story all day and, it appears to me that the data taken from this ‘event’ would prove really valuable. At the time of writing there is still no sign of anyone getting reconnected. Warnings that some reconnections could take a week have sent people into panic buying mode. Got cash, will buy. No cash, no buy. It’s as simple as that. Government officials have advised people stock up on water and essentials as no time can be predicted for reconnection.

Convid was in my opinion a global distribution and public behaviour stress test in ‘real time’. Remember the toilet roll panic during Convid? Remember the total chaos that ensued? Stay with me, you ain’t seen nothing yet?

What happens when you switch a whole country’s electricity grid OFF? Better still why not shut 2 down? How long does it take before the population has no idea what is going on? Confusion and panic go hand in hand. Where to go for information? How to get home? Who will pick the kids up from school? How can you communicate with loved ones? How to charge up a phone even though there is no internet? How to get out of the lift, when it suddenly stops between floors? How to fill up the car with fuel when you are 40 miles from home and running on an empty tank? How do you pay for shopping? Pick up your prescription? How do you contact the emergency services? Water pumps down? And…if you are driving an electric car, bet you wish you hadn’t now! It isn’t until the power goes down that you realise your whole life depends upon it (unless you are fortunate enough to be living off grid entirely, but you wouldn’t be reading this if you were!), everything we take for granted runs on electricity.

Combine China/USA tariffs and looming shipping container crisis with panic buying, and you have a recipe for disaster. What could possibly go wrong? If the shelves are already empty through panic buying, don’t expect them to be filled up anytime soon!

Ask yourself; was this a deliberate exercise? Engineered on purpose by those in ‘CONtrol’ to observe the effects upon entire populations? After all, how would the public ‘behave’? Food for thought don’t you agree? I would suggest that a deliberate planned blackout should, at the very least be considered. However, it is so much easier to blame someone else, nothing to see here…quite literally…IN THE DARK.

What happens in Europe could well happen here. Not if, but when. Could you cope with 10 days of darkness? Information desert? No access to your bank account or cash? .

Finally, don’t forget in my previous post made just yesterday I reported on;

Sentient World Simulation: A tool to test PsyOps and control people’s minds

Fascinating article from The Expose, with plenty of links; The Sentient World Simulation (“SWS”) is a project developed by the US Department of Defence to create a synthetic mirror of the real world that can be continuously calibrated with real-world information.

I don’t believe in coincidences, do you? Should I feel guilty that I picked up 1 extra pack of loo roll and 2 boxes cat food? Am I being a Debi Doomer AGAIN or am I just trying to sound a gentle alarm …just in case? You decide

On May 14, 1957, Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover gave a speech to the Minnesota State Medical Association about the realities and dangers of our dependence on energy and the frailty of complex civilization.

He also provided a warning, which if heeded would have bought us more time. It was not.

This speech provides a fascinating perspective from over half a century ago. Unspoken yet hinted at is the inevitability of the collapse of civilization.

Even if humankind doesn’t go extinct, societies would once again face the harsh realities endured for millennia. Energy lifted us from poverty, but the benefits are fleeting on a geological scale. Exploiting this short lived gift/curse, humanity finds itself in an inextricable quagmire, as we’ve simultaneously destroyed all other ecological supports on which we rely. The best we could have hoped for a carefully managed transition back to pre-fossil fuels society. Instead we’ve accelerated towards the cliff by doubling down on energy dependence.

Ironically, Rickover is known as the “Father of the Nuclear Navy,” and his influence on the Navy and its warships was of such scope that he is often considered one of the Navy’s most important officers. He harnessed energy to lift American power projection, yet anticipated the empire’s eventual demise caused by a lack of energy.

The full text of his speech was posted to The Oil Drum in 2007 and I’m afraid it will get lost over time. So to help preserve it, I am sharing it with you.

‐————–

Energy Resources and Our Future

I am honored to be here tonight, though it is no easy thing, I assure you, for a layman to face up to an audience of physicians. A single one of you, sitting behind his desk, can be quite formidable.

My speech has no medical connotations. This may be a relief to you after the solid professional fare you have been absorbing. I should like to discuss a matter which will, I hope, be of interest to you as responsible citizens: the significance of energy resources in the shaping of our future.

We live in what historians may some day call the Fossil Fuel Age. Today coal, oil, and natural gas supply 93% of the world’s energy; water power accounts for only 1%; and the labor of men and domestic animals the remaining 6%. This is a startling reversal of corresponding figures for 1850 – only a century ago. Then fossil fuels supplied 5% of the world’s energy, and men and animals 94%. Five sixths of all the coal, oil, and gas consumed since the beginning of the Fossil Fuel Age has been burned up in the last 55 years.

These fuels have been known to man for more than 3,000 years. In parts of China, coal was used for domestic heating and cooking, and natural gas for lighting as early as 1000 B.C. The Babylonians burned asphalt a thousand years earlier. But these early uses were sporadic and of no economic significance. Fossil fuels did not become a major source of energy until machines running on coal, gas, or oil were invented. Wood, for example, was the most important fuel until 1880 when it was replaced by coal; coal, in turn, has only recently been surpassed by oil in this country.

Once in full swing, fossil fuel consumption has accelerated at phenomenal rates. All the fossil fuels used before 1900 would not last five years at today’s rates of consumption.

Nowhere are these rates higher and growing faster than in the United States. Our country, with only 6% of the world’s population, uses one third of the world’s total energy input; this proportion would be even greater except that we use energy more efficiently than other countries. Each American has at his disposal, each year, energy equivalent to that obtainable from eight tons of coal. This is six times the world’s per capita energy consumption. Though not quite so spectacular, corresponding figures for other highly industrialized countries also show above average consumption figures. The United Kingdom, for example, uses more than three times as much energy as the world average.

With high energy consumption goes a high standard of living. Thus the enormous fossil energy which we in this country control feeds machines which make each of us master of an army of mechanical slaves. Man’s muscle power is rated at 35 watts continuously, or one-twentieth horsepower. Machines therefore furnish every American industrial worker with energy equivalent to that of 244 men, while at least 2,000 men push his automobile along the road, and his family is supplied with 33 faithful household helpers. Each locomotive engineer controls energy equivalent to that of 100,000 men; each jet pilot of 700,000 men. Truly, the humblest American enjoys the services of more slaves than were once owned by the richest nobles, and lives better than most ancient kings. In retrospect, and despite wars, revolutions, and disasters, the hundred years just gone by may well seem like a Golden Age.

Whether this Golden Age will continue depends entirely upon our ability to keep energy supplies in balance with the needs of our growing population. Before I go into this question, let me review briefly the role of energy resources in the rise and fall of civilizations.

Possession of surplus energy is, of course, a requisite for any kind of civilization, for if man possesses merely the energy of his own muscles, he must expend all his strength – mental and physical – to obtain the bare necessities of life.

Surplus energy provides the material foundation for civilized living – a comfortable and tasteful home instead of a bare shelter; attractive clothing instead of mere covering to keep warm; appetizing food instead of anything that suffices to appease hunger. It provides the freedom from toil without which there can be no art, music, literature, or learning. There is no need to belabor the point. What lifted man – one of the weaker mammals – above the animal world was that he could devise, with his brain, ways to increase the energy at his disposal, and use the leisure so gained to cultivate his mind and spirit. Where man must rely solely on the energy of his own body, he can sustain only the most meager existence.

Man’s first step on the ladder of civilization dates from his discovery of fire and his domestication of animals. With these energy resources he was able to build a pastoral culture. To move upward to an agricultural civilization he needed more energy. In the past this was found in the labor of dependent members of large patriarchal families, augmented by slaves obtained through purchase or as war booty. There are some backward communities which to this day depend on this type of energy.

Slave labor was necessary for the city-states and the empires of antiquity; they frequently had slave populations larger than their free citizenry. As long as slaves were abundant and no moral censure attached to their ownership, incentives to search for alternative sources of energy were lacking; this may well have been the single most important reason why engineering advanced very little in ancient times.

A reduction of per capita energy consumption has always in the past led to a decline in civilization and a reversion to a more primitive way of life. For example, exhaustion of wood fuel is believed to have been the primary reason for the fall of the Mayan Civilization on this continent and of the decline of once flourishing civilizations in Asia. India and China once had large forests, as did much of the Middle East. Deforestation not only lessened the energy base but had a further disastrous effect: lacking plant cover, soil washed away, and with soil erosion the nutritional base was reduced as well.

Another cause of declining civilization comes with pressure of population on available land. A point is reached where the land can no longer support both the people and their domestic animals. Horses and mules disappear first. Finally even the versatile water buffalo is displaced by man who is two and one half times as efficient an energy converter as are draft animals. It must always be remembered that while domestic animals and agricultural machines increase productivity per man, maximum productivity per acre is achieved only by intensive manual cultivation.

It is a sobering thought that the impoverished people of Asia, who today seldom go to sleep with their hunger completely satisfied, were once far more civilized and lived much better than the people of the West. And not so very long ago, either. It was the stories brought back by Marco Polo of the marvelous civilization in China which turned Europe’s eyes to the riches of the East, and induced adventurous sailors to brave the high seas in their small vessels searching for a direct route to the fabulous Orient. The “wealth of the Indies” is a phrase still used, but whatever wealth may be there it certainly is not evident in the life of the people today.

Asia failed to keep technological pace with the needs of her growing populations and sank into such poverty that in many places man has become again the primary source of energy, since other energy converters have become too expensive. This must be obvious to the most casual observer. What this means is quite simply a reversion to a more primitive stage of civilization with all that it implies for human dignity and happiness.

Anyone who has watched a sweating Chinese farm worker strain at his heavily laden wheelbarrow, creaking along a cobblestone road, or who has flinched as he drives past an endless procession of human beasts of burden moving to market in Java – the slender women bent under mountainous loads heaped on their heads – anyone who has seen statistics translated into flesh and bone, realizes the degradation of man’s stature when his muscle power becomes the only energy source he can afford. Civilization must wither when human beings are so degraded.

Where slavery represented a major source of energy, its abolition had the immediate effect of reducing energy consumption. Thus when this time-honored institution came under moral censure by Christianity, civilization declined until other sources of energy could be found. Slavery is incompatible with Christian belief in the worth of the humblest individual as a child of God. As Christianity spread through the Roman Empire and masters freed their slaves – in obedience to the teaching of the Church – the energy base of Roman civilization crumbled. This, some historians believe, may have been a major factor in the decline of Rome and the temporary reversion to a more primitive way of life during the Dark Ages. Slavery gradually disappeared throughout the Western world, except in its milder form of serfdom. That it was revived a thousand years later merely shows man’s ability to stifle his conscience – at least for a while – when his economic needs are great. Eventually, even the needs of overseas plantation economies did not suffice to keep alive a practice so deeply repugnant to Western man’s deepest convictions.

It may well be that it was unwillingness to depend on slave labor for their energy needs which turned the minds of medieval Europeans to search for alternate sources of energy, thus sparking the Power Revolution of the Middle Ages which, in turn, paved the way for the Industrial Revolution of the 19th Century. When slavery disappeared in the West engineering advanced. Men began to harness the power of nature by utilizing water and wind as energy sources. The sailing ship, in particular, which replaced the slave-driven galley of antiquity, was vastly improved by medieval shipbuilders and became the first machine enabling man to control large amounts of inanimate energy.

The next important high-energy converter used by Europeans was gunpowder – an energy source far superior to the muscular strength of the strongest bowman or lancer. With ships that could navigate the high seas and arms that could outfire any hand weapon, Europe was now powerful enough to preempt for herself the vast empty areas of the Western Hemisphere into which she poured her surplus populations to build new nations of European stock. With these ships and arms she also gained political control over populous areas in Africa and Asia from which she drew the raw materials needed to speed her industrialization, thus complementing her naval and military dominance with economic and commercial supremacy.

When a low-energy society comes in contact with a high-energy society, the advantage always lies with the latter. The Europeans not only achieved standards of living vastly higher than those of the rest of the world, but they did this while their population was growing at rates far surpassing those of other peoples. In fact, they doubled their share of total world population in the short span of three centuries. From one sixth in 1650, the people of European stock increased to almost one third of total world population by 1950.

Meanwhile much of the rest of the world did not even keep energy sources in balance with population growth. Per capita energy consumption actually diminished in large areas. It is this difference in energy consumption which has resulted in an ever-widening gap between the one-third minority who live in high-energy countries and the two-thirds majority who live in low-energy areas.

These so-called underdeveloped countries are now finding it far more difficult to catch up with the fortunate minority than it was for Europe to initiate transition from low-energy to high-energy consumption. For one thing, their ratio of land to people is much less favorable; for another, they have no outlet for surplus populations to ease the transition since all the empty spaces have already been taken over by people of European stock.

Almost all of today’s low-energy countries have a population density so great that it perpetuates dependence on intensive manual agriculture which alone can yield barely enough food for their people. They do not have enough acreage, per capita, to justify using domestic animals or farm machinery, although better seeds, better soil management, and better hand tools could bring some improvement. A very large part of their working population must nevertheless remain on the land, and this limits the amount of surplus energy that can be produced. Most of these countries must choose between using this small energy surplus to raise their very low standard of living or postpone present rewards for the sake of future gain by investing the surplus in new industries. The choice is difficult because there is no guarantee that today’s denial may not prove to have been in vain. This is so because of the rapidity with which public health measures have reduced mortality rates, resulting in population growth as high or even higher than that of the high-energy nations. Theirs is a bitter choice; it accounts for much of their anti-Western feeling and may well portend a prolonged period of world instability.

How closely energy consumption is related to standards of living may be illustrated by the example of India. Despite intelligent and sustained efforts made since independence, India’s per capita income is still only 20 cents daily; her infant mortality is four times ours; and the life expectance of her people is less than one half that of the industrialized countries of the West. These are ultimate consequences of India’s very low energy consumption: one-fourteenth of world average; one-eightieth of ours.

Ominous, too, is the fact that while world food production increased 9% in the six years from 1945-51, world population increased by 12%. Not only is world population increasing faster than world food production, but unfortunately, increases in food production tend to occur in the already well-fed, high-energy countries rather than in the undernourished, low-energy countries where food is most lacking.

I think no further elaboration is needed to demonstrate the significance of energy resources for our own future. Our civilization rests upon a technological base which requires enormous quantities of fossil fuels. What assurance do we then have that our energy needs will continue to be supplied by fossil fuels: The answer is – in the long run – none.

The earth is finite. Fossil fuels are not renewable. In this respect our energy base differs from that of all earlier civilizations. They could have maintained their energy supply by careful cultivation. We cannot. Fuel that has been burned is gone forever. Fuel is even more evanescent than metals. Metals, too, are non-renewable resources threatened with ultimate extinction, but something can be salvaged from scrap. Fuel leaves no scrap and there is nothing man can do to rebuild exhausted fossil fuel reserves. They were created by solar energy 500 million years ago and took eons to grow to their present volume.

In the face of the basic fact that fossil fuel reserves are finite, the exact length of time these reserves will last is important in only one respect: the longer they last, the more time do we have, to invent ways of living off renewable or substitute energy sources and to adjust our economy to the vast changes which we can expect from such a shift.

Fossil fuels resemble capital in the bank. A prudent and responsible parent will use his capital sparingly in order to pass on to his children as much as possible of his inheritance. A selfish and irresponsible parent will squander it in riotous living and care not one whit how his offspring will fare.

Engineers whose work familiarizes them with energy statistics; far-seeing industrialists who know that energy is the principal factor which must enter into all planning for the future; responsible governments who realize that the well-being of their citizens and the political power of their countries depend on adequate energy supplies – all these have begun to be concerned about energy resources. In this country, especially, many studies have been made in the last few years, seeking to discover accurate information on fossil-fuel reserves and foreseeable fuel needs.

Statistics involving the human factor are, of course, never exact. The size of usable reserves depends on the ability of engineers to improve the efficiency of fuel extraction and use. It also depends on discovery of new methods to obtain energy from inferior resources at costs which can be borne without unduly depressing the standard of living. Estimates of future needs, in turn, rely heavily on population figures which must always allow for a large element of uncertainty, particularly as man reaches a point where he is more and more able to control his own way of life.

Current estimates of fossil fuel reserves vary to an astonishing degree. In part this is because the results differ greatly if cost of extraction is disregarded or if in calculating how long reserves will last, population growth is not taken into consideration; or, equally important, not enough weight is given to increased fuel consumption required to process inferior or substitute metals. We are rapidly approaching the time when exhaustion of better grade metals will force us to turn to poorer grades requiring in most cases greater expenditure of energy per unit of metal.

But the most significant distinction between optimistic and pessimistic fuel reserve statistics is that the optimists generally speak of the immediate future – the next twenty-five years or so – while the pessimists think in terms of a century from now. A century or even two is a short span in the history of a great people. It seems sensible to me to take a long view, even if this involves facing unpleasant facts.

For it is an unpleasant fact that according to our best estimates, total fossil fuel reserves recoverable at not over twice today’s unit cost, are likely to run out at some time between the years 2000 and 2050, if present standards of living and population growth rates are taken into account. Oil and natural gas will disappear first, coal last. There will be coal left in the earth, of course. But it will be so difficult to mine that energy costs would rise to economically intolerable heights, so that it would then become necessary either to discover new energy sources or to lower standards of living drastically.

For more than one hundred years we have stoked ever growing numbers of machines with coal; for fifty years we have pumped gas and oil into our factories, cars, trucks, tractors, ships, planes, and homes without giving a thought to the future. Occasionally the voice of a Cassandra has been raised only to be quickly silenced when a lucky discovery revised estimates of our oil reserves upward, or a new coalfield was found in some remote spot. Fewer such lucky discoveries can be expected in the future, especially in industrialized countries where extensive mapping of resources has been done. Yet the popularizers of scientific news would have us believe that there is no cause for anxiety, that reserves will last thousands of years, and that before they run out science will have produced miracles. Our past history and security have given us the sentimental belief that the things we fear will never really happen – that everything turns out right in the end. But, prudent men will reject these tranquilizers and prefer to face the facts so that they can plan intelligently for the needs of their posterity.

Looking into the future, from the mid-20th Century, we cannot feel overly confident that present high standards of living will of a certainty continue through the next century and beyond. Fossil fuel costs will soon definitely begin to rise as the best and most accessible reserves are exhausted, and more effort will be required to obtain the same energy from remaining reserves. It is likely also that liquid fuel synthesized from coal will be more expensive. Can we feel certain that when economically recoverable fossil fuels are gone science will have learned how to maintain a high standard of living on renewable energy sources?

I believe it would be wise to assume that the principal renewable fuel sources which we can expect to tap before fossil reserves run out will supply only 7 to 15% of future energy needs. The five most important of these renewable sources are wood fuel, farm wastes, wind, water power, and solar heat.

Wood fuel and farm wastes are dubious as substitutes because of growing food requirements to be anticipated. Land is more likely to be used for food production than for tree crops; farm wastes may be more urgently needed to fertilize the soil than to fuel machines.

Wind and water power can furnish only a very small percentage of our energy needs. Moreover, as with solar energy, expensive structures would be required, making use of land and metals which will also be in short supply. Nor would anything we know today justify putting too much reliance on solar energy though it will probably prove feasible for home heating in favorable localities and for cooking in hot countries which lack wood, such as India.

More promising is the outlook for nuclear fuels. These are not, properly speaking, renewable energy sources, at least not in the present state of technology, but their capacity to “breed” and the very high energy output from small quantities of fissionable material, as well as the fact that such materials are relatively abundant, do seem to put nuclear fuels into a separate category from exhaustible fossil fuels. The disposal of radioactive wastes from nuclear power plants is, however, a problem which must be solved before there can be any widespread use of nuclear power.

Another limit in the use of nuclear power is that we do not know today how to employ it otherwise than in large units to produce electricity or to supply heating. Because of its inherent characteristics, nuclear fuel cannot be used directly in small machines, such as cars, trucks, or tractors. It is doubtful that it could in the foreseeable future furnish economical fuel for civilian airplanes or ships, except very large ones. Rather than nuclear locomotives, it might prove advantageous to move trains by electricity produced in nuclear central stations. We are only at the beginning of nuclear technology, so it is difficult to predict what we may expect.

Transportation – the lifeblood of all technically advanced civilizations – seems to be assured, once we have borne the initial high cost of electrifying railroads and replacing buses with streetcars or interurban electric trains. But, unless science can perform the miracle of synthesizing automobile fuel from some energy source as yet unknown or unless trolley wires power electric automobiles on all streets and highways, it will be wise to face up to the possibility of the ultimate disappearance of automobiles, trucks, buses, and tractors. Before all the oil is gone and hydrogenation of coal for synthetic liquid fuels has come to an end, the cost of automotive fuel may have risen to a point where private cars will be too expensive to run and public transportation again becomes a profitable business.

Today the automobile is the most uneconomical user of energy. Its efficiency is 5% compared with 23% for the Diesel-electric railway. It is the most ravenous devourer of fossil fuels, accounting for over half of the total oil consumption in this country. And the oil we use in the United States in one year took nature about 14 million years to create. Curiously, the automobile, which is the greatest single cause of the rapid exhaustion of oil reserves, may eventually be the first fuel consumer to suffer. Reduction in automotive use would necessitate an extraordinarily costly reorganization of the pattern of living in industrialized nations, particularly in the United States. It would seem prudent to bear this in mind in future planning of cities and industrial locations.

Our present known reserves of fissionable materials are many times as large as our net economically recoverable reserves of coal. A point will be reached before this century is over when fossil fuel costs will have risen high enough to make nuclear fuels economically competitive. Before that time comes we shall have to make great efforts to raise our entire body of engineering and scientific knowledge to a higher plateau. We must also induce many more young Americans to become metallurgical and nuclear engineers. Else we shall not have the knowledge or the people to build and run the nuclear power plants which ultimately may have to furnish the major part of our energy needs. If we start to plan now, we may be able to achieve the requisite level of scientific and engineering knowledge before our fossil fuel reserves give out, but the margin of safety is not large. This is also based on the assumption that atomic war can be avoided and that population growth will not exceed that now calculated by demographic experts.

War, of course, cancels all man’s expectations. Even growing world tension just short of war could have far-reaching effects. In this country it might, on the one hand, lead to greater conservation of domestic fuels, to increased oil imports, and to an acceleration in scientific research which might turn up unexpected new energy sources. On the other hand, the resulting armaments race would deplete metal reserves more rapidly, hastening the day when inferior metals must be utilized with consequent greater expenditure of energy. Underdeveloped nations with fossil fuel deposits might be coerced into withholding them from the free world or may themselves decide to retain them for their own future use. The effect on Europe, which depends on coal and oil imports, would be disastrous and we would have to share our own supplies or lose our allies.

Barring atomic war or unexpected changes in the population curve, we can count on an increase in world population from two and one half billion today to four billion in the year 2000; six to eight billion by 2050. The United States is expected to quadruple its population during the 20th Century – from 75 million in 1900 to 300 million in 2000 – and to reach at least 375 million in 2050. This would almost exactly equal India’s present population which she supports on just a little under half of our land area.

It is an awesome thing to contemplate a graph of world population growth from prehistoric times – tens of thousands of years ago – to the day after tomorrow – let us say the year 2000 A.D. If we visualize the population curve as a road which starts at sea level and rises in proportion as world population increases, we should see it stretching endlessly, almost level, for 99% of the time that man has inhabited the earth. In 6000 B.C., when recorded history begins, the road is running at a height of about 70 feet above sea level, which corresponds to a population of 10 million. Seven thousand years later – in 1000 A.D. – the road has reached an elevation of 1,600 feet; the gradation now becomes steeper, and 600 years later the road is 2,900 feet high. During the short span of the next 400 years – from 1600 to 2000 – it suddenly turns sharply upward at an almost perpendicular inclination and goes straight up to an elevation of 29,000 feet – the height of Mt. Everest, the world’s tallest mountain.

In the 8,000 years from the beginning of history to the year 2000 A.D. world population will have grown from 10 million to 4 billion, with 90% of that growth taking place during the last 5% of that period, in 400 years. It took the first 3,000 years of recorded history to accomplish the first doubling of population, 100 years for the last doubling, but the next doubling will require only 50 years. Calculations give us the astonishing estimate that one out of every 20 human beings born into this world is alive today.

The rapidity of population growth has not given us enough time to readjust our thinking. Not much more than a century ago our country – the very spot on which I now stand was a wilderness in which a pioneer could find complete freedom from men and from government. If things became too crowded – if he saw his neighbor’s chimney smoke – he could, and often did, pack up and move west. We began life in 1776 as a nation of less than four million people – spread over a vast continent – with seemingly inexhaustible riches of nature all about. We conserved what was scarce – human labor – and squandered what seemed abundant – natural resources – and we are still doing the same today.

Much of the wilderness which nurtured what is most dynamic in the American character has now been buried under cities, factories and suburban developments where each picture window looks out on nothing more inspiring than the neighbor’s back yard with the smoke of his fire in the wire basket clearly visible.

Life in crowded communities cannot be the same as life on the frontier. We are no longer free, as was the pioneer – to work for our own immediate needs regardless of the future. We are no longer as independent of men and of government as were Americans two or three generations ago. An ever larger share of what we earn must go to solve problems caused by crowded living – bigger governments; bigger city, state, and federal budgets to pay for more public services. Merely to supply us with enough water and to carry away our waste products becomes more difficult and expansive daily. More laws and law enforcement agencies are needed to regulate human relations in urban industrial communities and on crowded highways than in the America of Thomas Jefferson.

Certainly no one likes taxes, but we must become reconciled to larger taxes in the larger America of tomorrow.

I suggest that this is a good time to think soberly about our responsibilities to our descendants – those who will ring out the Fossil Fuel Age. Our greatest responsibility, as parents and as citizens, is to give America’s youngsters the best possible education. We need the best teachers and enough of them to prepare our young people for a future immeasurably more complex than the present, and calling for ever larger numbers of competent and highly trained men and women. This means that we must not delay building more schools, colleges, and playgrounds. It means that we must reconcile ourselves to continuing higher taxes to build up and maintain at decent salaries a greatly enlarged corps of much better trained teachers, even at the cost of denying ourselves such momentary pleasures as buying a bigger new car, or a TV set, or household gadget. We should find – I believe – that these small self-denials would be far more than offset by the benefits they would buy for tomorrow’s America. We might even – if we wanted – give a break to these youngsters by cutting fuel and metal consumption a little here and there so as to provide a safer margin for the necessary adjustments which eventually must be made in a world without fossil fuels.

One final thought I should like to leave with you. High-energy consumption has always been a prerequisite of political power. The tendency is for political power to be concentrated in an ever-smaller number of countries. Ultimately, the nation which control – the largest energy resources will become dominant. If we give thought to the problem of energy resources, if we act wisely and in time to conserve what we have and prepare well for necessary future changes, we shall insure this dominant position for our own country.